Jake's Resume vs Harvard Resume Template

If you're choosing a resume template for a tech career, two names come up constantly: Jake's Resume and the Harvard resume template. Both are widely recommended, both are clean and professional, and both are ATS-friendly. So which one should you use?

This guide gives you an honest, side-by-side comparison. No hype, no sales pitch — just the differences that actually matter when you're applying for jobs.

Quick Background: Where Each Template Comes From

Jake's Resume

Created by Jake Gutierrez, a software engineer. Originally a LaTeX template hosted on Overleaf and GitHub. Designed specifically for CS students and software engineers. It spread through r/EngineeringResumes, r/cscareerquestions, and peer-to-peer recommendations in CS programs. It's the most forked resume template on GitHub.

Harvard Resume Template

Created by Harvard's Office of Career Services. A general-purpose resume template designed for all industries — not just tech. It's distributed through Harvard's career center and widely copied by other universities. The template follows traditional resume conventions that work across industries from consulting to non-profits.

Design Philosophy

The fundamental difference between these templates is who they were designed for and what they optimize.

Neither approach is objectively better — they serve different needs. A resume that looks "packed" to a management consultant looks "efficient" to a software engineer.

Section Structure Comparison

Jake's Resume Sections

1. Header (name + contact on one line)
2. Education
3. Experience
4. Projects
5. Technical Skills

Harvard Template Sections

1. Header (name centered, contact below)
2. Education
3. Experience
4. Leadership & Activities
5. Additional (skills, languages, interests)

The key structural difference: Jake's Resume has a dedicated Projects section (critical for CS students), while the Harvard template has Leadership & Activities (critical for business and liberal arts students). Jake's also includes a focused Technical Skills section, while Harvard lumps skills into an "Additional" catch-all.

ATS Compatibility

Both templates are ATS-friendly. They share the core attributes that matter:

• Single-column layout — no tables, no multi-column sections
• Standard section headings that ATS parsers recognize
• No graphics, icons, or images that could confuse parsers
• Clean text hierarchy that extracts correctly

You won't have ATS issues with either template. The real differentiation is in how effectively each template presents your specific content.

When to Use Jake's Resume

Jake's Resume is the better choice when:

• You're applying for software engineering, data science, ML, DevOps, or other technical roles
• You have substantial technical projects you need to showcase
• You want to maximize the amount of technical content on one page
• Your target audience is technical hiring managers and engineers who value density
• You're a CS student and your Projects section is your strongest asset

When to Use the Harvard Template

The Harvard template is the better choice when:

• You're applying for non-technical roles: consulting, product management, business development, finance
• Your leadership and extracurricular experience is a key differentiator
• You're targeting generalist recruiters who scan hundreds of resumes across industries
• You want a more traditional, conservative presentation
• You're early in your career and your experience spans multiple fields (not exclusively tech)

Content Space: The Numbers

Because Jake's Resume uses tighter spacing and smaller margins, it fits approximately 15-20% more content on a single page compared to the Harvard template. For a software engineer with multiple projects and detailed experience bullets, this difference matters.

Typography and Polish

Jake's Resume (the LaTeX original) uses Computer Modern, a serif font family with exceptional typographic quality. The kerning, ligatures, and micro-typography are noticeably sharper than what Word or Google Docs can produce.

The Harvard template is typically created in Word and uses standard fonts (Times New Roman or Cambria). It looks perfectly professional, but the typographic quality is a step below LaTeX output.

This difference is subtle — most recruiters won't consciously notice it. But in a stack of 200 resumes, the LaTeX-typeset one does look slightly more polished.

Can You Combine the Best of Both?

Yes — and many successful candidates do. The best approach for tech roles:

• Use Jake's Resume layout and formatting (density, typography, Projects section)
• Borrow Harvard's emphasis on clear, accomplishment-focused bullet writing
• If you have strong leadership experience, add it as a bullet within your Experience section rather than as a separate section
• Keep the Technical Skills section from Jake's — it's essential for keyword matching

The Verdict

For software engineering and technical roles: Jake's Resume wins. It's purpose-built for the audience that reviews your resume, it maximizes content space, and the Projects section is essential for students and early-career engineers.

For non-technical or cross-functional roles: the Harvard template is a safe, proven choice with broad recognition.

For product management or technical PM roles: either works, but Jake's Resume signals stronger technical orientation.

More Guides