Rejectless
Resume linter
Built for Software Engineers & New grads

Your resume, but linted.Every line gets feedback.

Rejectless flags fluff, weak claims, and vague bullets then ask you to add context to solidfy the point. There's no magic rewrite or one tap fix, because only you know what you did. The goal is interviews, not “a job someday.”

Brutal and honest feedbackCredibility checksMade for Engineers
rejectless lint
resume.md
Resume
per-line feedback
12
“Built scalable systems” too vague
13
“Reduced p95 latency from 420ms → 180ms via caching + query tuning”
14
“Worked with many technologies” name 2–4 relevant tools
15
“Responsible for everything” non-verifiable claim
16
“Shipped 8 features; improved activation +11% via onboarding A/B tests”
Lint output
actionable fixes
Fluff detected
WARNING
Replace with measurable outcome + scope (latency, throughput, users, $$).
Generic phrasing
WARNING
Swap “many technologies” for specifics tied to impact.
Credibility risk
ERROR
“Responsible for everything” triggers skepticism—narrow to defensible ownership.
Line-level lintingFluff detectionCredibility checks
Demo

Try out Rejectless

Each line is linted and problamatic bullet is flagged

Game programmer

2024-2025

    Developed a hybrid AOT/JIT Unity Hot-Update prototype that loads hotfix assemblies at runtime, removing the need for full rebuilds.
    Designed core game architecture in several projects
    Click bullet to open
    Created and implemented the procedural animation for the player character’s scarf using Verlet Integration, improving the character’s movement and realism.
HOW IT WORKS

A pipeline, not a vague chat

Treat your resume like code: deterministic checks, sharp feedback, and focused rewrites.

01 ORIGINAL

resume.pdf

A. Patel

SWE · New Grad

EXPERIENCE

PROJECTS

SKILLS

TSReactNodeSQLAWSDocker

Reads “fine” until the screen asks: what did you do, how, and what changed?

02 LINTED

rejectless

FLAGGED LINE

MAJOR

“Improved system performance significantly and led major initiatives.”

WHAT’S WRONG

  • • “Significantly” is unbounded (no constraint or baseline).
  • • “Led initiatives” doesn’t say ownership or deliverable.
  • • No artifact: feature shipped, tool built, or metric moved.

DO THIS NEXT

  1. State what you built (action + object).
  2. Add method/tooling (how you did it).
  3. Give outcome (latency/cost/bugs/time/users).

No score. Just severity + reasons + concrete next actions.

03 RESOLUTION

apply fix

ADD DETAILS

revise

What you did

REQUIRED

Built a caching layer for profile reads in the API.

How you did it

RECOMMENDED

Redis + TTL strategy, added metrics + rollback guard.

What changed

OPTIONAL

Reduced p95 latency from 180ms → 95ms; fewer timeouts.

Apply fix
✓ resolved

Resolution turns vague bullets into defensible claims.

1) Parse bullets into claims

Breaks bullets into action, scope, and outcome so weak statements can’t hide.

2) Lint for signal

Flags fluff, generic phrasing, missing metrics, and credibility risks.

3) Rewrite with context

Just don't rephrase the bullet but add more context and clarity

FEATURES

Iron out each and every bullet

Engineers skim. Recruiters skim faster. Your bullets must earn attention in seconds.

Fluff + vagueness detector

Calls out empty verbs and weak claims (what changed, by how much, at what scale).

Credibility checks

Flags bullets that read exaggerated and suggests narrower, defensible ownership.

You make it stronger

We don't rewrite the bullet for you, give more context to bring clarity into the point, if you can't delete it

Diagnostics dashboard

Each issue is classified as Major, Moderate and Minor with color coding. Keep track of all the issues and complete them one by to make your resume iron clad

PRICING

Try it now. Pricing comes later.

Rejectless is currently in early access. You can use it today; pricing will be introduced later for new users with advance notice.

Lint my resume
FAQ

Questions, answered

Practical details about how Rejectless works and what to expect.

What exactly does Rejectless do?
Rejectless lints your resume line-by-line. It flags vague bullets, fluff, credibility risks, and missing specifics, then guides you through a structured rewrite (what you did / how you did it / what changed).
How is this different from a normal AI resume review?
Most tools give broad feedback or rewrite everything into generic text. Rejectless produces per-line diagnostics with severity, concrete next actions, and fixes you can apply one bullet at a time.
Is this an ATS resume checker?
No. Rejectless does not scan for ATS keywords or formatting rules.
Do I need metrics for every bullet?
No. Metrics help, but Rejectless also accepts qualitative outcomes. If you don’t have numbers, it pushes you toward concrete results (what improved, what shipped, what got faster, what got simpler).
Will it rewrite my resume with made-up achievements?
No. Rejectless is designed to increase credibility, not inflate claims. It prompts you to provide defensible scope and outcomes and warns when a line reads exaggerated.
Who is it for?
Software engineers and new grads applying to SWE roles—anyone who wants bullets that read like evidence and hold up under interview follow-ups.
Is my resume data stored or used for training?
You resume is stored locally except when user requests download from server, its stored temporarily.